Portal de Aguilas
www.portaldeaguilas.com
The Popular Party criticized the City of Eagle to the budget that the PSOE is designed for 2016 conducted without future project, vacuous and lacking in transparency.
It is that budgets for 2016 are empty of content, without project and lack of transparency.
Budgets that have increased over the previous year as a result of the rise of IBI and that citizens will notice next year.
Budgets where, despite the sanitized coffers leave without bank loans and the remaining 2 million cash last year, have not been increased consignments of Social Services.
While the Socialist Party boasted that it was the legislature of people, well, these estimates have not been made thinking of them precisely.
The Popular Party will have particularly struck a new game, the Contingency Fund, endowed with € 738,000, nearly 3% of the budget.
This is a provision to cover any unforeseen and non-discretionary expenditures.
This background and the type of expenditure that can be financed with him are very ambiguous and can lead to misuse, serving to mask well known and predictable but unattractive to citizens, a consequence of unrealistic budgets and partisan intentions expenses.
In short, they have endowed a fund with a lot of money, about one million euros but still do not know that they are going to do with it or will not say.
We explained that this money has been allocated "just in case" had to do something extraordinary.
A blank check, a lack of transparency unprecedented.
Another interesting fact the budget is heading 281,000 € have budgeted "just in case" they come up to borrow, a game meaningless as the City of Eagle owes nothing to the banks so that no to amortize capital and pay interest.
The fact is that between the reported for debt repayment money, there is not, and the Contingency Fund are a million euros in the budget that is not at all, not knowing what to do with it, which is "just in case".
In short, the Socialist Party has designed a budget for 2016 no project for the future, devoid of content and lacking in transparency.
The Popular Party if he had a project to continue cutting taxes.
The Socialists could have done, because we leave the well sanitized coffers.
The money is better in the pocket of the aquiline than a fund that does not know that they will do with it.
Source: PP Águilas
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies